...

Vegan Diet: 7 Key Takeaways from ‘What the Health’

Purely vegan diet
Share This :

Vegan Diet

I have a friend who lives in Switzerland and recently participated in the Geneva triathlon. After congratulating him, he said he was pleased, mainly because he did it on a purely vegan diet. I was a bit shocked that he ate “no protein”? WRONG! Lots of protein, just not from the places you commonly expect! Then. I congratulated a friend of mine on her legs (they looked great!) and how much weight she had lost with a purely vegan diet.
purely vegan diet
what the health
What she said was again a bit shocking. “vegan legs.”  Although I am a doctor, nutrition is not taught to us in medical school…okay, maybe four weeks out of 4 years of studying. so yea, in essence, none. So this was unexpected. But I didn’t realize how beneficial a purely vegan diet would be until a third friend told me to watch a documentary called “What the Health”.  It was almost midnight, and I couldn’t sleep. No YOGA for me that day. So naturally, I opened Netflix and looked for the documentary. I didn’t expect to stay alert throughout the whole thing. I was tired, but for some reason, everything that was said was entirely life-changing. WHY? It was things I had never learned in school. Something I had never researched myself. Things I didn’t expect and wanted to know more about.

For those of you who haven’t seen it yet, watch it and let me know what it makes you think!

In the following days, I decided that I should write about this and vlog about it too. So I started my research. Little did I know that another physician would do a video criticizing the documentary, calling it “fake science.” Mind you, when one doctor says it’s science, and another doctor says it’s fake science… well, it leads to a lot of confusion and doubt. After all, these are doctors, so which one do you believe?!?!

What I noticed was that the physician that was criticizing the documentary didn’t give any evidence or research. So I started my journey into this tough topic.

As I always say! I am not here to tell you what to do or to urge you to change your life or your eating habits. I am here to tell you the benefits and dangers of certain things so that you can make your own informed decisions! Knowing why something is good or bad also helps keep you in line after you decide to make a change. Hopefully, anyway!

Based on the documentary AND the critiques of the other physician, I have researched and written this post to address a few points made. There were lots of points! So If you think I missed one, LET ME KNOW! So I can send that one too! I have chosen a few points that I believe were the most “shocking,” “fake-sounding,” “alarming,” and “controversial,” both from the documentary and the “debunking video.” So, if you need a break, take it! Stretch, have some water, or even some coffee! And let’s dive in! –1-

What the Health Documentary Point:

Sugary foods OR high-carb diets don’t cause diabetes; animal fat causes muscle cells to build up tiny particles of fat, and this leads to insulin resistance; the sugar stays in your blood and causes diabetes.

Debunker Criticism: Sugar and carbs are stored as fat, basic physiology. The idea that fat particles deposit on muscle cells and don’t let sugar into cells is FAKE SCIENCE!

vegan diet

Conclusion:

High-carbohydrate and high-sugar diets predispose you to obesity and insulin resistance. Obesity is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes, and insulin resistance causes it.

BUT a purely vegan diet

What the documentary said was that high fat in the diet is the real issue. And this is true. The traditional way to help patients control their disease is by controlling their sugar and carb intake. The issue with this is that diets low in carbs make you eat more fats and protein, so you feel appropriately energized. By minimizing fat, especially saturated fat, in the food, insulin resistance is improved. This means that even if you are eating sugars and lots of carbs, by lowering your amount of fat consumption, your body can deal with the sugar more adequately.

A study was conducted on diets higher in grains, veggies, and fruits and lower in dairy and meat consumption. Results showed that many diabetic patients were able to reduce their medications or go off them entirely. Studies on muscle cell fat content show that athletes and people with diabetes have higher levels of muscle cell fat, BUT only athletes have higher sensitivity for insulin.

I take this info like this:

Yes, overeating sugar and carbohydrates may predispose you to obesity, but only if your body cannot adequately deal with the amount of sugar you are putting in it.

How can you help your body deal with sugar and carbs? 

Exercise! And lower saturated fats, like the ones found in animal proteins (dairy, steak, chicken, and even fish)

Eating eggs is like feeding your kids cigarettes?

– 2 –

Documentary Point: Eating eggs is like feeding your kids cigarettes?

Egg yolk is full of cholesterol and fat; its main function is to maintain the development of a baby chick. When we eat it, it coats our blood cells; our blood gets thicker, changes our hormones, and raises our cholesterol levels; there’s nothing healthy about eating the yolk of the egg. Eating one egg is like smoking five cigarettes? Debunker Criticism: Be cautious of individuals who seek out studies that confirm their preexisting beliefs.

Conclusion:

Appears to be on the side of the debunker. One study found that a diet high in eggs but lower in saturated fats, or food that is high in eggs but replaces saturated fats with healthier fats, actually had a positive or no effect on harmful cholesterol levels. Another study found that short-term egg consumption did not severely affect arterial function in healthy people. The International Journal of Cardiology, as referenced in the documentary, concluded that eating 1–2 eggs a day does not adversely affect blood cholesterol or LDL (bad cholesterol).

This same study supported the debunker physician’s view that dietary cholesterol “may be less detrimental to cardiovascular health than previously thought.” So, I’m not sure why they chose a section of the ‘methods’ to say eating a sausage and egg sandwich was equivalent to McDonald’s McMuffin. It did say that, but as a comparison. Another study showed that the relationship between dietary cholesterol and Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) is small because most subjects can effectively adapt to higher levels of cholesterol intake. Nevertheless, lowering dietary cholesterol content might reduce the risk of CHD considerably in a subgroup of individuals who are highly responsive to changes in cholesterol intake.” A meta-analysis on eggs and risk of coronary heart disease showed a dose-response. Basically, more eggs (up to 1/day) were not found to be associated with coronary heart disease.

BUT is it compared to cigarettes?

A Canadian study did find that one egg was comparable to smoking five cigarettes, BUT what they didn’t add in the documentary was that the study itself said more research was needed to find any other dietary confounders, as well as the role of waist circumference. The study concluded that people at risk should lower their egg ingestion. This is similar to other studies that also show eggs are not bad for your arteries.

In summary,

I found evidence that they’re poor and evidence that they’re not harmful. So I conclude that anything in excess is detrimental! People at risk of certain problems should not eat certain things. This is the trend with every disease. While it’s a crucial subject to explore, I believe it’s overly dramatic to depict it as feeding your child five cigarettes.  – 3 –

Documentary Point:

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) lists plutonium, cigarettes, and processed meat as level 1 carcinogens.

Debunking criticism: plutonium is vegan.

Conclusion:

YES. All of the above-mentioned are labeled as group 1 carcinogens on the WHO website. By the way, it’s W-H-O, not the who (like the group… each letter is pronounced individually; it’s not a word if that makes sense).

Anyway!

Is plutonium vegan, as the debunking physician said? I didn’t find any evidence that plutonium is found in plant foods. I’m not sure what drove him to say something like that. Whether or not he has supporting evidence for this, or he just wanted to make a shocking statement, I have no clue. I was shocked, and it made me look it up. If you are anything like me, you might do the same, and if you do find something that I missed, please share it with me! – 4 – 

Documentary Point: If people knew how bad these foods are, maybe they wouldn’t eat them anymore.

Debunker Criticism: NO! People were told cigarettes are harmful, and they still smoke, so people will keep up with bad habits even if told how bad they are.

Conclusion:

It’s 50/50. Sure, we’re all told smoking is terrible, not exercising is terrible, sodas are bad, etc., etc. How many of us make changes may not be as big as we’d like. But ever since smoking awareness has gone up, the rates of smoking have gone down.

Do eating eggs is like feeding your kids cigarettes?

Impact of Public Awareness on Smoking and Chronic Disease

This impact is evident from what happened after the Surgeon General reported that smoking caused cancer in 1964. Since then, smoking prevalence has decreased from almost 45% to 19%, according to a CDC report. Adults lowered their smoking rates because of this announcement? Maybe. It seems like a likely correlation. Oddly enough, in 1998, a Master Settlement Agreement with tobacco companies led to the elimination of billboards, transit, and written advertisements targeting underage youth.

After this settlement, youth smoking dropped quite quickly from its peak of almost 40% down to nearly 17%. Awareness affects! Whether or not it’s a quick one is an entirely different story. The changes in adults were gradual too. The decline was a bit quicker among teens. This demonstrates the remarkable effectiveness of informational interventions in bringing about change! So is this documentary a fix to the high levels of chronic disease? NO, not quite. But it’s a step in the right direction to bring awareness to how a diet can impact your health in good and bad ways.

Rabies Transmission

Rabies is a viral disease that is usually spread to humans by contact with infected animals. The virus waits in the salivary glands of the animal. Once they bite someone, it travels into the broken skin and into the brain tissue, where it wreaks havoc. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC, 2011), in the last 100 years, there has been a change in the types of animals, causing the most rabies transmission in the United States. Although the most common culprits worldwide are domestic animals such as dogs, especially in underdeveloped countries, in the United States, the most common hosts are “wild carnivores and bats.”

Wild carnivores include raccoons, foxes, coyotes, and skunks (CDC, 2011). This change of host is likely due to the rabies vaccines administered to domestic animals on their routine veterinarian visits, which began in the 1940s (Finnegan, C. J., S. M. Brookes, et al., 2003).

Since the 1900s, rabies mortality in the United States has decreased from approximately 100 fatalities annually to about one or two (World Health Organization [WHO], 2017).

What the health - Vaccination

Suppose it is mainly due to the routine vaccination of domestic animals. Also, the majority of the population in the United States has easy access to health care, and post-exposure prophylaxis is readily available (CDC, 2011). The United States population is also well aware. It has access to various resources that would allow them to research the risks of being bitten by an animal, especially a wild animal such as a bat, raccoon, skunk, fox, or coyote, and domestic pets as well.

These are all things that may not be as accessible to the rest of the world, which is a likely reason why most deaths due to rabies occur in areas with less than adequate health care in combination with living in an area that does not vaccinate domestic animals and has no access to the internet or other resources to keep educated on a topic unless provided to them.

Global Rabies Statistics and Healthcare Access

This limitation of awareness was found in Thailand, where although knowledge about rabies and its severity is high, “awareness about bat transmission specifically was deficient.” Only 10% of the people who took a survey identified bats as a potential source of rabies, and 36% said they would likely not take any specific action if bitten by a bat (Robertson, Kis, Boonlert Lumlertdacha, et al., 2011). According to the WHO, although rabies affects all continents, 95% of deaths occur in Asia and Africa. Even if rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is readily available to people in these areas, the costs of PEP are $40 and $49, respectively (WHO, 2017). A value that even some uninsured American citizens may have difficulty paying, let alone aperson in Asia or Africa whose “average daily income can be between $1-2 per person” (WHO, 2017).

Furthermore, the diagnosis of rabies has also evolved.

what the health - rabies disease

Rabies is Viral

Previously, veterinarians could diagnose the disease in animals only after death, meaning they had to euthanize the animal—if it wasn’t already dead—to collect brain samples and confirm the diagnosis (CDC, 2011). Today, instead of euthanizing a perfectly healthy animal, the animal can be watched for ten days after it bites someone. If no symptoms of rabies appear, it means the animal is rabies-free (CDC, 2011). That not only decreases harm to healthy animals but also reduces the need to treat prophylactically, which, according to the WHO, is high, “typically exceeding 3,000” (WHO, 2017). Diagnosing rabies in humans is quite different, and although there are many diagnostic tests available, the WHO reports that those available are not “suitable for detecting rabies infection before the onset of clinical disease.”

Fatal Infestations

“Fatal Infestations,” a video about the rabies outbreak, was devastating, mainly because rabies is a preventable and curable disease if caught before symptoms of the infection emerge.

Since rabies is an infection of the nervous system, symptoms include seizures, erratic behavior and aggression, excessive salivation (drooling), aversion to water (hydrophobia), and even paralysis and coma. Once any of these symptoms manifest, the disease is too far gone, and recovery is unlikely (CDC, 2011). Although physicians likely know the symptoms of rabies well, they often miss the diagnosis. In medicine, there’s a saying: “If you don’t think of it, you won’t diagnose it.” Rabies was not considered, as the video suggested.

An epidemiological investigation requires specific steps to be taken in whichever order the investigator deems necessary (Gregg, Michael B, 3-13).

The video shown in class showed a small portion of what an actual investigation entails. The investigation began when local health departments called the CDC because of concerns of an outbreak. The CDC arrives and speaks with the families to gather descriptive epidemiology by identifying when and where the outbreak occurs, who is affected, and how many people are involved (Gregg, Michael B, 156–157). They looked for connections between all three victims now in a coma, intubated, and in the ICU. They then conducted a series of lab tests and imaging on all patients to diagnose the cause, but their efforts remained unsuccessful, and they could not make the diagnosis.
squirrel sitting

When the first fatality occurred and officials identified the organ donor as the source, they continued descriptive epidemiology, now focusing on the donor himself.

The CDC went to the patient’s home and spoke to friends and family. Luckily, this led to information about a bat bite on the donor’s chest in the previous weeks. The CDC then requested an autopsy and sent investigators to the donor’s home looking for the bats with infrared lenses. CDC officials found multiple bats and tested them for the rabies virus. They discovered the same rabies virus in both the donor and the bat, confirming the source of the infection (“Fatal Infestations”).

The video ends with the death of the last living victim. Any situation where an individual is still alive and on the brink of death due to an unknown cause, which has already killed others, the involvement of local health departments and the CDC is crucial to determine the cause and source to treat and prevent further spread. Any initial investigation requires a case count and case definition (Gregg, Michael B, 157). In this situation, the case definition would have been erratic behavior, seizures, and coma. The count would have been three with the first victim as patient zero. The video revealed that the symptoms began approximately 3-7 days after the organ transplant surgery, meaning that whatever the cause, its symptoms occur rapidly and effects are catastrophic.

Descriptive epidemiology

This would add pressure on me as an investigator to conduct my work not only accurately but also very quickly (Gregg, Michael B, 10-13). My next step would be to begin data collection. Descriptive epidemiology involves analyzing demographics, exposures, and similarities among the three cases, as well as gathering hospital information and discussing with doctors to determine whether the infection originated from the surgical room, the tools used, or the staff present. Since it’s unclear if any of these are the cause, I’d worry about a wider exposure and possible

epidemic. over the hedge memesRabies

This information helps form a hypothesis of the possible source of infection and diagnosis; it would also help me decide whether or not to launch a full investigation (Gregg, Michael B, 186). In this case, I would because of the high risk of an epidemic of an unknown disease that can kill within 3-7 days. Once I ruled out the organ recipient hospital as the source of infection, I shifted my hypothesis to the donor hospital and the donor himself as the possible sources.

I would use visual aids and maps to help graph the case count and orient them in place (Gregg, Michael B, 191-196). Will help as I gather information from the donor hospital. Doing this may show the point of origin of infection and narrow down the possible source. This shows that as investigators progress through the investigation, they will also change and narrow the hypothesis until they find the true source.

Key Information Required About the Donor

The information I would require about the donor includes his symptoms on arrival at the hospital, which included erratic behavior, seizures, and drooling. Information gathered from friends and family on recent exposures, which would reveal the bat bite weeks back. The combination of the bat bite and the symptoms, the doctor in me, would immediately be concerned about rabies.

Just as the CDC did, I would request an immediate biopsy of the donor looking specifically for Negri bodies in the brain (CDC, 2011), as well as send investigators to the home to look for bats. After confirmation of the diagnosis of rabies, no one can do much for the surviving victim who received an organ from the infected donor. Unfortunately, they already presented with symptoms, and as mentioned previously, recovery is not likely.

Rabies

Rabies is a viral disease that usually spreads to humans by contact with infected animals.

It is imperative to continue assessing risks of exposure to other people besides the initial victims. Assess any bodily fluid exchange with the donor, as rabies symptoms typically appear within 1 week to 3 months. Administer rabies PEP promptly before neurological symptoms appear to effectively prevent transmission, reduce fatalities, and save lives. Furthermore, I would be concerned about the presence of bats in the neighboring areas of the donors’ homes. If bats are in one home, others may be at risk; a written report is vital for epidemiological investigations.

Educational Outreach and Preventive Measures

Executing recommendations and implementing prevention measures are crucial to keeping healthy individuals safe and free from disease risk. This includes surveillance for bat, wild carnivore, and rabid dog sightings. Bats and rabid animals can infect domestic animals, so monitoring changes in domestic animal behavior is essential for surveillance.

I would distribute pamphlets educating the public on rabies risks and immediate steps to take if bitten by animals. 2) Make an appointment with your doctor to evaluate your risk of exposure and receive PEP if needed. I would seek help from Animal Control to remove raccoons, bats, and other rabies reservoirs from the streets.

The above includes what I would do if I were the investigator on the rabies case. 

As explained, I would do some things differently from what was seen in the video. With my medical background, I could have identified rabies symptoms earlier and helped prevent the delay in diagnosis. I would have also used visual aids to help identify the common area of exposure and the pattern of transmission. U.S. research prioritized bat risks, but international studies face added challenges like language barriers, cultural differences, and political issues. These would cause significant delays in acquiring data and arriving at a diagnosis quickly.

Challenges in International Rabies Investigations

In international settings, focus on vaccinating domestic dogs against rabies, monitoring street dogs, and addressing data trust issues globally. They are teaching the population about ways to protect themselves and others. Inform families that those most at risk of acquiring rabies are their children (Finnegan, C. J., S. M. Brookes, et al., 2003).

Community Education and Prevention

burrows in the holeEducating the public about all potential rabies reservoirs is crucial to prevent challenges like those experienced in Thailand. Preventing re-emergence and epidemics of a disease is the goal. They implement prevention measures. They will struggle to provide enough rabies vaccines for all dogs and cannot eliminate every potential risk of exposure. Another thing to consider is access to health care.

If a dog bites someone, do they know where to go to get PEP? Can they get there quickly and safely? Will it be affordable? Public health officials must overcome obstacles, especially internationally, where limited healthcare access requires a clear, well-prepared plan. Overall, the investigation conducted during the rabies video does show the typical course of an epidemiological investigation.

Delays in reporting and diagnosis led to three rabies transmissions; raising awareness among the public and physicians is crucial.

Doctor, Health, health & doctor, Healthy food, Medical, Wellness

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Let’s Stay Connected

Stay Inspired & Keep Learning

Subscribe to receive exclusive health tips, new blog updates, and the occasional wellness surprise — no spam, just real value.